A senior judge has been let off for flashing twice at a tube traveller whilst standing close to her on a train.
The young female passenger on the Waterloo-bound train was “shocked” when she got to the bottom of the page of her newspaper and saw his “flaccid penis right there”.
If it was flaccid, maybe he’s impotent, which would explain his need to indulge in perverse behaviour. Or even if he was going commando on a hot day AND his zip came undone, there can be no excuse for holding it in two hands and for the incident to happen twice, with the SAME woman.
I think is she had stayed calm and gone 5 out of ten, “what do you think love?” and turned to the women in the carriage. Then she would have more evidence and witnesses.
My friend often wondered what would happen if more women struck the offending “member”. Surely flashers would think twice about doing it if the standard response was a good thwack, preferably with a rolled up newspaper. But then I suppose masochists would start getting in on the act.
The Police have warned that the rise in temperatures and rise in perverts are connected. Don’t you just love these value-added press releases by them Bobbies.